Everything you wrote should happen. Plus, the courts must take all their money, plus business damages penalties, plus emotional distress penalties, and give the money and hardware to the millions of businesses and Youtubers that Alphabet Inc. defrauded- since they implemented ML Fairness Algorithms.

The entire corporation needs to be smashed into little pieces, every penny given to the people and businesses they defrauded and every bolt of every computer they own sold for scrap to pay the fines and damages.

Sadly I think there are enough scheming jews, self-interested chinks, and traitorous whites that this won't work. They'll find people to do the work for them no matter what.

Those who pay to advertise with these subsidiaries of Alphabet Inc. are a whole other count of fraud against them. Holy shit this thing keeps getting bigger and bigger. This may be the google killer after all!

There is a massive legal difference between not guaranteeing a service or payment and actively working with intent to prevent others from making money. In other words to defraud the other company or actively prevent them from making money through fraud.

Alphabet Inc. created the ML Fairness Algorithm with intent to manipulate facts and prevent other businesses from profiting- this is explicit fraud to defraud. It is a massive tort fuck up, if not a criminal action as well.

I would let the courts decide that. I'd really like to see how a civil trial jury would determine what the perception of google's TOS are. And there are several arguments that this could be very difficult to defend against. Then we have this lovely thing, TOS is basically has the legal history of a lawyer's paperweight. I wouldn't be surprised if google's TOS is gutted in court or even used against them.

Did google commit tortious interference by tweaking algorithms to impact conservative groups and companies? Because if a web designer has a contract with a liberal site, they might be able to optimize very easily and in turn promised similar results to a conservative site. But because google actively interfered with their algorithm to target that site (and other similar sites), it can be argued that google broke a number of business laws and possibly anti-discrimination laws ( religion is protected, willing to bet churches hired someone to write their website ). The contract between two parties was targeted and monetarily damaged by the company that is suppose to be a neutral messenger. That sure looks like tortious interference. If UPS took your companies products, broke them as part of company policy, then delivered them to the customer, you would have a really good claim to sue UPS. And that is a very similar situation to google.

I think if google ends up sitting in front of a jury, a lot of the implied protections will go out the window. Because people know how they feel about google websites and TOS. They know how the sites have been marketed and will likely be hostile to some google favoring legal definitions.

What would be very interesting would be taking a peak at google's 401k and other investments and how they relate to their optimization.

Honestly this might be an attorney feeding frenzy. Google is going into discovery in a class action lawsuit with conservative employees and conservative applicants. If something in that discover leads down into a bigger rabbit hole, particularly with the P. V. video, google might be publishing a lot of evidence that opens them up to future litigation.

Except they promised they are a neutral party with the implication ranking is based on popularity and correctness. Turns out they use their fraudulent cover to mislead, manipulate, and craft public perception while financially injuring parties they specifically mislead to their platforms. Which is yet another fraud. Torturous interference?

There are in fact multiple fraud angles. Likewise, any and all injured by their fraud is due restitution.

That's what they said about the Tobacco industry...

google is not silicon valley.... google is an agent of shitsrael who ironically has it fully engaged in wartime propaganda aimed at its host country...

Defrauding business partners is a whole other type of lawsuit and in a very different league for penalties than a simple Service failure or mischaracterization.

It's very possible Alphabet Inc and Google will be forced to break up to pay this level of fines and damages.

You would get nothing but a coupon and the satisfaction of watching the goyim beat the jewish goliath called jewgle.

Fraud to defraud . Nothing in the T&C claim an agreement to have one's business defrauded.

Doesn’t matter. This is big because now that the courts are involved and both civil and criminal charges are possible at such a massive level- the Military Industrial Complex can no longer aid Alphabet Inc. Officers will not risk their careers or pensions. National Security Corporations will not risk their future contracting worthiness to save a dying leviathan.

This very likely is the beginning of the end of Alphabet Inc.

There's about a million laws protecting businesses from being defrauded by other businesses. Take your pick. Torturous interference for one. Page ranking has very little to do with it. The fact Google created a sophisticated system to manipulate facts, distort the brand image of other businesses, prevented other businesses from making money, and prevented business partners (whom Google profited of those other business creative works previously) from engaging in business... that's the point.

The question is more about did they imply or guarantee treating content equally which they are supposed to in order to maintain their protections.

Every business absolutely has a right to not be defrauded. Fraud to defraud is very different legally than simple demonetization or a drop in page rank.

It doesn't matter how good their lawyers are for one simple reason- lawyers will always lawyer. When the facts are not on their side, as is clearly the case here, and the potential for massive success and money on the opposite position, then the very best lawyers will abandon ship like ths rats they are. The best lawyers on the planet are not going to let their reputations be tarnished by sticking on the losing side...

And when the States Attornies General get involved, it'll be a whole other level.

Hahahahaha

Prove they're de-ranking you or censoring you because of your political views could be a thing since they have claimed to be both a platform and a publisher at the same time. Platforms don't get to censor, and are therefore not accountable for the content. Publishers can be sued for content which is defamatory or libelous, so they get to take down whatever they want and claim they're protecting themselves.

This is false. CDA Sec. 230 gives Internet companies immunity even if they moderate content. They can "censor" all they want. Read the language of the law. They can't be held liable for any actions they take to limit access to content they consider to be "objectionable."

(c) Protection for “Good Samaritan” blocking and screening of offensive material (1) Treatment of publisher or speaker No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

(2) Civil liability No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of— (A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

Doesn't apply when the company actively and with intent defrauded their business partners. ML Fairness Algorithm is an intentional and active system used to defraud their business partners from making money or conducting business.